Source the claim
Material claims are atomic records connected to the evidence that supports, qualifies or contradicts them.
The Gastromica Editorial Graph
A recipe becomes publishable only when its identity, sources, interpretation, safety, image rights and search intent survive independent checks—and JB makes the final human decision.
Material claims are atomic records connected to the evidence that supports, qualifies or contradicts them.
Regional and household variation is not averaged away to manufacture one definitive answer.
Named external cooks may verify that they prepared the dish. Their credit never becomes proof that Gastromica’s exact recipe was kitchen-tested.
JB approves an exact version. A later substantive edit invalidates that approval and returns the page to review.
Core agents
Resolves dish identity, names and boundaries.
Connects material claims to independent sources.
Preserves meaningful regional and household variation.
Develops the approachable Gastromica interpretation.
Audits quantities, conversions, allergens, storage and safety.
Challenges unsupported cultural and authenticity language.
Adds sensory cues, substitutions and failure recovery.
Validates search intent, metadata, links and visible schema.
Attempts to reject the finished record before JB sees it.
Regional research desks
Balkans
Greece and the Eastern Mediterranean
Caucasus
Levant
North Africa
Central Asia
Central and Eastern Europe
These are AI-assisted research roles with source registries and escalation rules—not people and not representatives of a culture. If region-connected evidence is insufficient, the correct output is “insufficient evidence,” not a completed recipe.
What scale means here
Gastromica maintains a private 1,000-dish research portfolio. Drafts stay out of search and out of the sitemap until their evidence graph, safety review, independent audit and JB approval are complete.
See how records change